Prototype of generic complex numbers #355

Closed
CommanderTvis wants to merge 1 commits from commandertvis/generic-complex into dev
CommanderTvis commented 2021-05-28 10:01:11 +03:00 (Migrated from github.com)
No description provided.
altavir (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2021-05-28 10:01:11 +03:00
altavir commented 2021-05-28 10:11:59 +03:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I still do not see motivation for generic Complex numbers. @CommanderTvis @grinisrit . Please create an issue and provide the use-case. You need to keep in mind that we can always easily add new types like TwoComponenInt. Right now, I think that generalizing Complex number won't bring a lot to the feature list, but will complicate development and create new problems for performance and discoverability.

I still do not see motivation for generic Complex numbers. @CommanderTvis @grinisrit . Please create an issue and provide the use-case. You need to keep in mind that we can always easily add new types like `TwoComponenInt`. Right now, I think that generalizing Complex number won't bring a lot to the feature list, but will complicate development and create new problems for performance and discoverability.
grinisrit (Migrated from github.com) requested changes 2021-07-30 10:11:31 +03:00
grinisrit (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

create DoubleComplex , FloatComplex etc.

create `DoubleComplex` , `FloatComplex` etc.

Pull request closed

Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.